My
stance on gun control is rather supporting both sides. I agree with people only being allowed to
carry handguns. I don’t see the
necessity in carrying a LG (Long Gun) such as a rifle or shotgun or any other
large weapons, unless they are a hunter. People have the right to want their
own self defense, but if someone is under attack and want to use a weapon as
self defense, a person with trained skill with a firearm could fend for
themselves with a handgun. In my opinion,
which will hopefully be taken into consideration, is that people should; be
allowed to carry a handgun only, take a 9 month safety course to obtain a
license and be over the age of 18 to carry a handgun, have no major health
issues, and the people who possess the weapon must properly have it in safe
custody while not in use and know how to properly use the weapon if needed. This subject also is taken into national
consideration, not just a state or local idea.
Almost every state makes a driver
gain initiate experience prior to obtaining a driver’s license, which is called
a GDL (Graduated Driver License). What
this does is give the teenager an opportunity to drive before getting their
license, allowing them to know what it’s really like to drive. Some states, such as Illinois, require up to
50 hours of driving and you must hold on to the permit with 9 months. Ever since the GDL program has been
established, there have been more drivers that are giving a safe environment
for the other drivers they see on the road.
If the United States pursued the
idea of a Firearm’s License that allows people 18 and older obtain a license
with a 9-month course for the right to hold a handgun, then the U.S. will see
fewer tragedies statistically. Having a
handgun is a privilege, just like driving is a privilege. Just like people have to earn their right to
obtain a driver’s license through the GDL program, people who take a firearm’s
safety course will grant them to opportunity to hold a firearm.
Following upon that, people must not
have any major health problems that can cause them to misuse the firearm. The owner must also know how to properly
maintain the weapon. According to http://www.minnpost.com/second-opinion/2012/12/health-risk-having-gun-home,
death certificate data show that there were 680 deaths each year from 2003 to
2007 that were accidental and 46 suicides daily in that same time period. Proper care must be taken into consideration.
Your first paragraph lays out your argument nicely. It is a good balance that does not lean too far to one side of the argument, which makes it seem that much more feasible.
ReplyDeleteThings to consider:
You may want to do a bit of research on self-defense. If an intruder comes into your home, there are actually restrictions for when you can and cannot actually fire a gun against them. While a family may feel safer, it is not necessarily legal to fire on an intruder.
I like the argument of having a required permit and courses that they have to take. This is a good middle ground.
You have a good start. Now just look up additional facts to help you with your argument. What you have is a good premise.
9/10